.jpg){kind=link}
Separate image from claim
Record the claim precisely: location, date, people and event. A photograph can be authentic while carrying a false caption. Preserve the post link and wording being checked without further spreading private details or distressing material.
Look for earlier versions
An image-search tool, such as the one described by Google Help, may find similar images. Compare framing, details, captions and page dates. The first displayed result is not necessarily the first publication. No result does not prove an image is new or authentic.
Cross-check independent clues
Look for signs, architecture, visible conditions and the creator’s account, then compare identified sources. Do not identify a private person by resemblance alone. Metadata may be absent or changed; it is a contextual clue, not standalone proof. Separate observations from assumptions in notes.
Publish a proportionate conclusion
State whether context is confirmed, contradicted or unknown. Unresolved doubt supports not sharing a claim, but not accusing someone of manipulation. If you shared a misleading version, correct it with the recovered source and explain what changed.
Choose the right check for the situation
These editorial pointers help prepare and review your work. Choose the situation matching your content; check current features and conditions in the cited sources before applying it to a service.
| Situation | Useful action | Mistake to avoid |
|---|---|---|
| Previously published image | Look for an earlier version and compare date, caption and context. | Inferring capture date solely from a repost date. |
| Cropped screenshot | Find the complete document or post; check removed elements. | Treating a visible excerpt as proof of the entire context. |
| No search results | Keep uncertainty explicit and continue with the source, location or other evidence. | Declaring authenticity because reverse image search finds nothing. |
| Misleading reuse | Explain the difference between the photograph and the accompanying claim. | Automatically calling a real photograph fake when its caption is wrong. |
Hypothetical example: apply the method
A photograph presented as recent appears on an older page. The team checks matching details and concludes the new caption conflicts with that record, without inventing the photographer’s identity.
Template to adapt
Copy this outline into your working document. It collects no information on this site; complete it for your situation.
Checked claim: Received link: Recovered versions: Page dates: Matching details: Independent sources: Conclusion and uncertainties:
Your pre-use check
0 / 4 checks completed
Frequently asked questions
Does a realistic image prove an event?
No. Context, provenance and sources still need checking even without obvious visual defects.
Is an automatic detector enough?
Do not turn its output into certainty. Find references and state verification limits.
Continue with related content
Sources and scope
Primary references consulted for factual points. Methods and templates are editorial suggestions; service conditions should still be checked in current documentation.