.jpg){kind=link}
Define account objectives
Write down services provided to the audience: inform members, explain activities, recruit volunteers or document a project. Connect each content family to an objective. Urgent information, a story and a participation request need different formats. Also specify topics the official account does not cover.
Describe observable choices
Replace “be professional” with concrete criteria: full dates, number sources, photo permission, checked names and intended action. Define how to respond to criticism and acknowledge mistakes. Volunteers should know what they may publish without guessing the approver’s preferences.
Organise review and corrections
State who reviews sensitive information, where sources are kept and how posts are corrected. Keep a record of important changes. Corrections should identify the issue without repeating more private information. The charter can link to an accessibility guide rather than repeat every instruction.
Test the document with cases
Give three different drafts to two team members. Compare choices, clarify ambiguous rules and remove wording that does not help decisions. Date the charter and name its owner. Revision becomes useful when a new format, team or incident reveals a gap.
Choose the right check for the situation
These editorial pointers help prepare and review your work. Choose the situation matching your content; check current features and conditions in the cited sources before applying it to a service.
| Situation | Useful action | Mistake to avoid |
|---|---|---|
| Several writers | Share purpose, audience, tone and concrete examples of acceptable wording. | Writing general values without explaining their application. |
| Controversial subject | Define who checks facts, approves the message and responds after publication. | Improvising an organisational position in comments. |
| Urgent content | Plan a short approval route, essential information and an identifiable approver. | Confusing urgency with the absence of fact checking. |
| Charter review | Use encountered difficulties to revise specific rules and date the version. | Adding contradictory instructions in conversations without a reference document. |
Hypothetical example: apply the method
A cultural association distinguishes practical announcements, authorised portraits and reports. Its charter requires a reference page for times and name review. It specifies who corrects an announcement when a location changes.
Template to adapt
Copy this outline into your working document. It collects no information on this site; complete it for your situation.
Audience and objectives: Content families: Excluded topics: Pre-publication criteria: Approval: Corrections: Owner and date:
Your pre-use check
0 / 4 checks completed
Frequently asked questions
Does a charter replace moderation rules?
It governs team publications. Public participation rules are another document to link.
How long should it be?
A short version that helps decisions is better than a long document nobody consults.
Continue with related content
Sources and scope
Primary references consulted for factual points. Methods and templates are editorial suggestions; service conditions should still be checked in current documentation.